Comparison between iso ts 16949 and iatf 16949. IATF 16949 QMS Implementation, Training and Auditing

Comparison between iso ts 16949 and iatf 16949 Rating: 6,1/10 1119 reviews

What is the difference between IATF 16949 and ISO/TS 16949?

comparison between iso ts 16949 and iatf 16949

Those that do not pass with a grade of at least 80 per cent will be deactivated as auditors. Organizations interested in certification may also want to start looking at training organizations or internal auditing resources. With embedded software expanding into multiple areas of automobile functionality, this additional assessment of parts with embedded software is as important to risk mitigation efforts as any other part of the manufacturing process. This training should also include the implementation plan, how it applies to the new standards and their roles within the framework of the plan. With the sources of risk ever expanding with the extent of technology and automation in manufacturing, creating safer and more stable work places is one of the top concerns of automotive manufacturing organizations worldwide.

Next

TS 16949 to IATF 16949:2016 Gap Analysis Checklist

comparison between iso ts 16949 and iatf 16949

No more worrying about adding useless processes to your procedures — our dedicated auditing professionals will make sure you only take the steps you need to meet certification requirements. Processes must be implemented in all companies to ensure the safety of products throughout their lifecycle. However, a quality internal audit needs to come from the right auditor. I just had a look at the link and it is the most comprehensive list - many thanks for the point to it! This is a new section with new and enhanced requirements that address current and emerging issues that the automotive industry is facing related to product and process safety. Please email our staff at and mention this blog.

Next

TS 16949 to IATF 16949:2016 Gap Analysis Checklist

comparison between iso ts 16949 and iatf 16949

So you should start to prepare now to make the transition by that date. Clarification of the requirement for targeting process effectiveness and efficiency. I cannot count the big difference between the 2. In addition, where applicable, decisions must be agreed upon by the customer. If the attitude is that they will never go for certification, you should have documented that they are compliant via a 2nd party audit. Be sure to double-check all systems and processes for appropriate implementation. This includes the requirement that organizations must provide a warranty for their product, as well as the requirement that the organization must have a warranty management process.

Next

Differences between IATF 16949:2016 vs ISO/TS 16949:2009

comparison between iso ts 16949 and iatf 16949

These can be technical, commercial, product or manufacturing process requirements, but they can also include general terms and conditions or specialized requirements. First and Second Party Auditors With all the new requirements associated with the new standard, proper assessment and auditing of organizational compliance with those standards is more important than ever. New products and processes are all part of the industry, however. The document can be downloaded. We are offering an updated and expanded range of training courses together with consultancy and support services to help organisations manage the changes required by the new standard. Of particular interest to these quality standards are safety-related parts and processes, product traceability, embedded software, corporate responsibility and warranty management.

Next

Compare TS 16949 to ISO 9001:2008

comparison between iso ts 16949 and iatf 16949

These requirements extend to the development of new manufacturing processes — while these new manufacturing processes may result in the same product, the change in procedure comes with risk. Internal audits help identify any potential problems or changes missed during the initial transition period. Ensures that organizations support the manufacturing process through defined roles, responsibilities, and effective escalation processes to drive process capability and stability. Additionally, enhancing customer satisfaction is pointed out in this clause. This requirement means that organizations must establish and maintain systems that minimize nonconformance as much as possible.

Next

IATF 16949:2016 to Replace ISO/TS 16949:2009 in October

comparison between iso ts 16949 and iatf 16949

This applies to products and materials throughout the lifecycle of the product. I had emails from my customer wherein their view was that since we where responsible for our suppliers quality, we could basically pick who we wanted. The list of items a through n requires that the organization addresses them in a documented and dedicated process for the management of product safety-related products and manufacturing processes. The focus of this clause is to ensure that every product performs its intended or designated function, without causing any unexpected loss or damage. Our issue was frequently what that authorization looked like. Our attention to the industry means we can communicate potential management systems approach impacts to our clients as soon as possible. However, the payoff of certification is substantial, and there are ways to make the process infinitely easier.

Next

IATF 16949:2009 vs. TS 16949:2016

comparison between iso ts 16949 and iatf 16949

While previous versions also required manufacturing feasibility assessments of one form or another, such requirements were not nearly as specific. Check in with our staff to get a copy details below. As long as you have audited them and they have a plan to achieve certification, you should be ok. First and foremost is the concept of agility. All evidence and documentation of the changes made should be collected and kept, as these are required for a transition audit.

Next

What is the difference between IATF 16949 and ISO/TS 16949?

comparison between iso ts 16949 and iatf 16949

As part of the new standard, transitioning organizations must document their management processes for handling product-safety related issues. Our extensive experience means our auditors can look into any questions you may have about the transition and auditing process. And that the supplier must be audited to 2nd Party level as per 8. Together, these two standards define the requirements of quality management systems along with the development, production and installation of automotive parts. How should this transition take place? The new standard requires products with embedded software to be acknowledged and accounted for in product validation processes, warranty management and troubleshooting, along with any customer requirements. A few auditors didn't like that. However, I do have a question that I hope can be answered! We are involved in several industry committees and standards writing teams, allowing us to carefully track changes within the industry, such as industry strategies, industry regulations and standard requirements.

Next